Showing posts with label Queen Victoria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Queen Victoria. Show all posts

Thursday, 1 January 2015

The King and His Reign IX: The King and Democracy

James Keir Hardie (1856-1915)
Published in The Spectator, 18th April 1935
1,380 words
(First read 01/01/2015)

EFB gives a brief and not especially riveting account of the birth of the British Labour Party, and is generally fairly even-handed and magnanimous about them¹, except with regard to what he believed to be their part in the ultimate refusal to allow the Russian royal family to find exile in the UK².  As with all these articles, Benson feels obliged to compare George V with his grandmother and father, and, it has to be said, he lays it on pretty thick in his final paragraph.
You can read the article online here.


¹ There's a mildly amusing ~ or perhaps the word is 'risible' ~ anecdote about the King refusing admittance to his garden party to Keir Hardie and his Labour-founding-father pals.
² Even though Labour weren't actually in power at the time.

Thursday, 11 December 2014

The King and His Reign IV: Women's Rights

Non-fiction ~ essay
Published in The Spectator, 15th March 1935
1,420 words
(First read 11/12/2014)

Mrs Pankhurst addresses a crowd
This one falls very much under the 'His Reign' category: as EFB makes barely any mention at all of George V, we can only assume he had nothing to do with women's rights¹.  What we get instead is a preamble in which we're reminded of Queen Victoria's opinions on uppity females (she was rabidly agin the idea), of Edward VII's opinions ditto (also agin, but less so), followed by a potted history of the pre-War emancipation movement, of the role women played during the War itself, and of their new-found freedom after it.
Benson was clearly no feminist; indeed he's often accused of outright misogyny ~ generally by people who've only read the Mapp and Lucia novels.  In fact his fictional women fall into two very pronounced types: (1) the cats, shrews, vixens, cows, harpies, bitches, witches (etc.) we all know and love from his satirical novels; and (2) the sweet, noble, impossibly virtuous, nauseating and frankly improbable saints so prominent in his (melo)dramas.  There was practically no middle ground. [Sorry ~ wandering off the point a bit.]  In this article he carefully aligns himself with those who claim post facto that their sole objection to the Suffragist movement was the activities of its more militant wing.  EFB might not ever have been violently anti-women's suffrage but, before the Great War, he rarely missed an opportunity to poke fun at it².


¹ I daresay he didn't approve, though.  Queen Mary wouldnt've let him.
² For his most sustained mock see the novel Mrs Ames (1912).  It has to be said that the eponymous heroine's feeble'n'futile pro-suffrage protest is the highlight of that book.

Wednesday, 24 September 2014

Our Hard-working Royal Family

The happy couple
Non-fiction ~ article
Published in The Yorkshire Evening Post, 29th November 1934¹
835 words
(First read 24/09/2014)

In language that teeters on the brink of being 'gushy' EFB treats us to a gooey dollop of pro-royal blancmange, published on the day of the nuptials of Prince George, Duke of Kent (1900-42) and Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark (1906-68).  He begins, for no particularly good reason, with a reminiscence of Queen Victoria's golden jubilee in 1887, and more stuff about Her Royal and Imperial Dumpiness, before moving on to a very brief mention of what hard workers the royals of the day are, and finishing off with a paean² to the bride and groom of the day.  His parting shot (as it were) is this slightly astonishing statement:
... on both [bride and groom] has [sic] been shed those gifts of beauty and of charm to which all surrender.
Need I say more?



¹ And possibly elsewhere.  
² I had to look this word up.



The article is reproduced below.  To the best of my knowledge this is the first time it's been put before a WWW readership, in full (more or less) and free of charge, so the first time it's seen light of day in 80 years.

Our Hard-working Royal Family by E. F. Benson
There are those who are old enough to remember Queen Victoria's Jubilee in 1887, and who were fortunate enough to have been inside Westminster Abbey on that day in June. The Queen had not been inside it for any great function since her Coronation, and then she was decked in Crown and robes of State, and she carried sceptre and orb and found them very heavy.
But on this second appearance, when the glittering company of kings and queens, and of her sons and daughters, her sons-in-law and daughters-in-law and grandchildren had passed up the nave, then came a little old lady leaning on a stick.
She was dressed in black satin with a white front, and on her head was a white bonnet with a black velvet band, and she had come to church to thank God for his loving kindness to her and her people during the 50 years of her reign. The choir sang the 'Te Deum' which the Prince Consort had composed, and in the anthem was embodied the Chorale which he had played to Mendelssohn on his new organ at Buckingham Palace.

Changed Opinion
An immense change had come over the nation's view of the Sovereign and the Royal family generally in those fifty years. Never had the Throne been held in such low esteem as when she succeeded to her two uncles, and a third, the most sinister of all, the Duke of Cumberland, was still the next heir. Then had followed 20 years of her blissful married life with Prince Albert, a man of the highest nobility of character, and those years utterly effaced the tradition of the uncles.
After his death came years in which, stricken and shattered in nerves, the Queen had almost completely withdrawn herself from the public view, and became to the mass of her subjects a legendary figure, till, gradually emerging from that gloomy evening of eclipse she passed, as if the sun had stood still for her, into a blaze of noonday. Through all those years she had worked unremittingly for her people, and though invisible, had admitted them to the naïve record of her private life, and the masses had learned to think of her not only as Queen and Empress, but a woman who sketched and went for picnics on the hill, and popped into the village shop, and bought shawls for the aged tenants of her cottages.

Real Workers
With that immense change came another hardly less significant in the whole temper of the nation towards the Royal Family. They found that they were not drones, supported in luxurious idleness by public funds, but hard-worked people, rushing about to open docks and libraries and schools and hospitals.
Their benevolent activities increased and increased, until to-day it is scarcely possible to open the daily paper without seeing that some member of the Royal House has been presiding at a philanthropic gathering or charitable committee, or perhaps flying to Lancashire in the morning to see for himself the conditions in a district where unemployment is eating out the hearts of those who long for work; and then flying back to London again to speak at some dinner in aid of a hospital.
A succession of such days would seem to most folk a foretaste of purgatory, or, at any rate, a guarantee against it; but such does not appear to be their view. It is just a duty, eagerly and genially performed, and its reward is devotion.
Nearly 50 years have elapsed since that day in June when Queen Victoria came up the nave of Westminster in her black satin dress, but the enthusiasm and loyalty that greeted her then are of a very similar quality to that that [sic] have inspired the rejoicings of this auspicious day. For the last week during these foggy November days London has been humming with the excitement of bees about to swarm in the sunshine of summer, and an indescribable delirium has invaded its streets and its conversations.

Loyalty to Throne
One still looks back to the Queen as the builder of those imperishable foundations on which the present loyalty to the Throne and to her House are based, for she set the Throne in the hearts and the affections of her people. It stands solid as ever, while the Thrones of Europe have tottered and fallen, and the devotion of the nation to the Royal Family and the joy of [illegible, probably the nation again] in their rejoicings are of the [two words illegible].
And even as the [illegible] Princess Alexandra took by storm the imagination of the English and retained it to the end when she came from Denmark to wed the grandfather of the bridegroom of to-day, even so has the Princess Marina* established herself with us.
The link of blood connects the two, for the Princess Marina's grandfather, George King of Greece, was brother to Queen Alexandra, and on both has [sic] been shed those gifts of beauty and of charm to which all surrender. Is it any wonder that the nation has succumbed?

Reproduced from The Yorkshire Evening Post, 29/11/1934

Thursday, 12 June 2014

Social Customs

Non-fiction - essay
First published in The Spectator, 29th April 1937*
1,515 words
(First read 12/06/2014)

Presumably the title Social Customs among the Extremely Rich and Fashionable in Victorian London wouldn't have been deemed catchy enough.  This reads somewhat like EFB's notes for his quartet of novellas Old London, which was published in the September of the same year.  He covers: the development of Belgravia, that swankiest of London districts; the 'season' and country house-parties; carriage etiquette; dinner-parties; entertainments at Buckingham Palace and elsewhere; seemly conversation; and so on and so forth.  It's all jolly interesting if you're interested in that kind of thing, but doesn't really tell you much which, if you're interested in that kind of thing, you wouldnt've known already.
You can read the article online here.

*The essay was collected in Sea Mist: Collected Spook Stories Volume 5 (2005), under the title Social Customs in 1837.

Thursday, 15 May 2014

The Baron

Non-fiction ~ review
Published in The Spectator, 16th April 1937
850 words
(Read 15/05/2014)

A review of Victoria's Guardian Angel: A Study of Baron Stockmar, by Pierre Crabites.  The said baron was a crony of Queen Victoria's uncle Leopold I, King of the Belgians, sent to the UK to act as adviser to the Queen and Prince Albert.  In his book Crabites argues that the baron was a massive power behind the throne; EFB believes that Crabites exaggerates his influence and importance.
The article can be read online here. 

Saturday, 22 February 2014

Queen Victoria

Non-fiction
Published 1935
(First read 22/02/2014)

A clever and witty biography in which Benson deals mainly with Victoria as woman and wife rather than queen and empress.  The tone is light, anecdotal, even a bit gossipy; there's humour, some of it ever-so-gently in mock of Her Royal Shortness and killer consort; EFB doesn't bore the pants off us with endless politics and politicians, instead sketching them in with a few skilled strokes; in short, the reader's left feeling that he probably knows enough about Queen Victoria now.  (The edition I have ~ Chatto & Windus, 1987 ~ also has the advantage of being 'lavishly illustrated', which always helps ...)  Not available online.

STOP PRESS
I just came across this in Mother (1925):
Once only had I seen [the Queen] close and quietly.  For one year, towards the end of the eighties, my father had taken a house on Deeside for August, and we were all invited to Balmoral.  And the diminutive old lady with the prominent blue eyes that looked very fixedly at you and the really beautiful voice, who was so small and so significant, was the head of everything, the incarnation of stability and security, something cosmic. ...  There was, too, something vividly individual about her, and if, never having seen her before, I had observed her walking into some very unexpected place, like a small restaurant in Soho, I verily believe I should have known her for Queen Victoria: nobody else could possibly be quite like that, nor could she possibly have been anyhow different.

Other critics

As a biographer, Mr. Benson has several outstanding qualities, all of which were won, perhaps, from his long apprenticeship to the novel. He has a remarkable ease of narrative, which makes event follow event with precision and grace; he has the collector's fancy for knowing all the facts, no matter how trivial; he has a quiet humor, quite free from any bitterness of wit, that enjoys gossip for its own sake and savors it as a kind of art in itself; and, most important of all, he has the suavity and gentleness of the born spectator, whom nothing can move very deeply but who understands even themost extraordinary aberrations of conduct without feeling contempt for their authors. These are very great gifts for a biographer, since they lead almost inevitably to the production of books which are rich in entertainment and full of information, books that have charm and vivacity and the polish that marks the elegant drawing-room. If they lack power and compelling prophetic insight, it is because they have the defects of their virtues.
~Charles David Abbott in The Saturday Review, 20/04/1935
  
There is no end to books on Queen Victoria, as, stunned, we contemplate the decay of her world. It is much as if admirers of the full-rigged ship devoted their talents to minute descriptions of the figurehead at the bow. Benson cannot possibly lend her life the acid contrast necessary to such a work, for he is the chief dispenser of Victorian memorabilia, and his volume, As We Were, successfully concealed, with innate charm, just what the Victorians were.
The chief interest to be found in a biography of Victoria is the attitude of the biographer. Granted that Lytton Strachey presented her unfairly, it must be admitted in the concession that he made a brilliant job of it. Benson treads in fearfully, being of angelic disposition, and sets about gracefully admitting the basis of Strachey’s libel, mitigating it with an amused tolerance which never swerves from printing, when pressed, the approximate truth. Where the author of Eminent Victorians once toyed wittily with a vast machine of politics, Benson is more concerned with giving a domestic background to Victoria’s life, though the facets of her career which must delight all amateur psychologists glitter occasionally by reflection in Benson’s amused eyes. Just why such a lush field is permitted to lie fallow, when the psychologists are so thorough in digging into the past, must be only a matter of diminishing royalties if such liberties are ever taken with a Royalty considerably diminished herself.
I read the book with interest chiefly in perusing an estimate of England’s queen by a gentleman antithetical to Lytton Strachey’s attitudes. Though it may be true that the latter lost considerable esteem in the obituaries the English critics paid him, Benson’s work, with its access to official archives, at least absolves Strachey of mendacity and rehabilitates much that the wittier man belittled. Benson’s book is the last word in gentleness. Until another Strachey - preferably John, or any other good Marxian - cares to survey the past of this remarkable queen, Benson’s biography will remain a standard work.
~Laurence Stallings in The American Mercury, 06/1935

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Friend of the Rich

Fiction ~ novella / long short story
Published 17th September 1937*
Approx. 20,000 words
(First read 22/10/2013)

The third of the 'Old London' quartet and a big improvement on the previous (Janet ~ qv) largely because Benson was on more familiar ground here.  Set in an indeterminate time during the reign of Queen Victoria, Friend of the Rich is the tale of a middle-aged society cow woman lady and her attempts ~ ultimately failed ~ to launch and subsequently monopolize a new couple of millionaires in town (they hale from Liverpool, no less!).  Mildly ... very mildly amusing.
Not available online.

* The four books in this collection were only ever published in the United States, as far as I'm aware.