Fiction ~ short story
Published 1920
(First read 27/05/2013)
Monday, 27 May 2013
Friday, 24 May 2013
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
Across the Stream
Fiction ~ novel
Published June 1919
Approx. 98,400 words
(First read 22/05/2013)
A supernatural romantic melodrama, very much in the same vein as The Image in the Sand (1905). The novel starts off extremely well ~ in fact so well that I was moved to tell my partner (who I rarely talk to about the rubbish I read) that I literally couldn't put it down until I got to the end of Ch. 2: it was some of the best stuff I'd ever read by EFB. The first book deals with the early childhood of our hero Archie, the son of an aristocrat ~ well, a lord at least. At the beginning he's a babe-in-arms; at the end of the section he's six ~ a rather precocious six, it has to be said. What makes the opening chapters so unusual is that, though it's a third-person account, it's told very much from the point-of-view of Archie himself: it's an account of 'awakening consciousness', of an entirely new human being gradually coming to the realization that he's a person, just as much as all those surrounding him are individual people. The reason I found this part (Chapters 1-3, at least, before the plot starts intervening) so unusual is that it is utterly real, believable, convincing.
Archie's earliest memory is of his nurse (Blessington ~ not 'Miss' or 'Mrs' or 'Bessie' Blessington: just 'Blessington') leaning over his cot and comforting him; she reappears throughout the novel and is always drawn with great charm and love, to the extent that it's impossible to believe EFB wasn't painting a portrait from life ~ the Benson kiddies' nurse was called Beth and was a family fixture, staying with them till her death. Archie also has two sisters, as did EFB in life, and a deceased older brother, ditto. He's written his two real-life real-world brothers out of the novel (inconvenient!), but his distant forbidding father has survived the cut.
Now then. It turns out that Archie has mediumistic powers, when he's contacted by the aforementioned deceased brother, named Martin ~ as was EFB's. At the end of Book One Archie is taken to Switzerland for his health ~ he's consumptive ~ to the exact place where Martin died of the same disease a few years earlier. Great plan! There the deceased contacts him again, saying that he won't be able to come another time but, by so doing, 'proving' to Archie's mum that his powers are real.
Book
Two, pp.105-205. We've now moved on something like 15-20 years and
Archie has ~ with dull inevitability ~ grown up to be EFB Stock
Character No.1, all 'slim, strong arms, incredibly browned with a month
of sea-bathing' and crisp, blond curls; he's also something of a poet;
in short, all the usual stuff. And, my dears, he is thick: Benson seems to have been peculiarly wedded to the notion that young men totally lacked the gift of insight,
clairvoyant or no. For lo! Archie is in love with a cold, calculating,
heartless, soulless vixen of a young woman (Helena), one of a pair of
sisters. Obviously she isn't in love with him, though her sister
(Jessie) is.
Well, to cut a very long and decidedly predictable story short: Archie, blind to Helena's true
character, falls deeper in love with her and is just about to propose when she goes and marries someone richer. (Obviously she doesn't love him either.) He's devastated and turns once more to the shade of Martin for solace. Unfortunately it soon becomes clear ~ to the reader, and to Jessie, but obviously not to Archie, totally devoid as he is of the gift of insight ~ that the shade he's communing with regularly isn't Martin at all, but some 'evil spirit' who promptly ~ very promptly ~ sends him to the bad: he becomes addicted to absinth (yes, you read that right) and resolves to have an affair with Helena behind her husband's back.
Just then some war or other starts in Europe (details are vague), the husband is conveniently killed in action, and Archie is 'rescued' by Jessie > The End. Yes, it really is like that: after maundering on for 300 pages or so, EFB suddenly realizes he's getting near his permitted word-count and wraps the whole thing up in about 20 pages with thoroughly unseemly haste.
VERDICT: 'uneven' doesn't come anywhere near covering Across the Stream: the first part is very good, uncharacteristically good; the remainder suffers from EFB's sadly all-too-typical ropey plotting and bletheriness; the ending feels more like afterthought than logical and consequential conclusion.
THE CRITICS
Published June 1919
Approx. 98,400 words
(First read 22/05/2013)
A supernatural romantic melodrama, very much in the same vein as The Image in the Sand (1905). The novel starts off extremely well ~ in fact so well that I was moved to tell my partner (who I rarely talk to about the rubbish I read) that I literally couldn't put it down until I got to the end of Ch. 2: it was some of the best stuff I'd ever read by EFB. The first book deals with the early childhood of our hero Archie, the son of an aristocrat ~ well, a lord at least. At the beginning he's a babe-in-arms; at the end of the section he's six ~ a rather precocious six, it has to be said. What makes the opening chapters so unusual is that, though it's a third-person account, it's told very much from the point-of-view of Archie himself: it's an account of 'awakening consciousness', of an entirely new human being gradually coming to the realization that he's a person, just as much as all those surrounding him are individual people. The reason I found this part (Chapters 1-3, at least, before the plot starts intervening) so unusual is that it is utterly real, believable, convincing.
Archie's earliest memory is of his nurse (Blessington ~ not 'Miss' or 'Mrs' or 'Bessie' Blessington: just 'Blessington') leaning over his cot and comforting him; she reappears throughout the novel and is always drawn with great charm and love, to the extent that it's impossible to believe EFB wasn't painting a portrait from life ~ the Benson kiddies' nurse was called Beth and was a family fixture, staying with them till her death. Archie also has two sisters, as did EFB in life, and a deceased older brother, ditto. He's written his two real-life real-world brothers out of the novel (inconvenient!), but his distant forbidding father has survived the cut.
Now then. It turns out that Archie has mediumistic powers, when he's contacted by the aforementioned deceased brother, named Martin ~ as was EFB's. At the end of Book One Archie is taken to Switzerland for his health ~ he's consumptive ~ to the exact place where Martin died of the same disease a few years earlier. Great plan! There the deceased contacts him again, saying that he won't be able to come another time but, by so doing, 'proving' to Archie's mum that his powers are real.
Well, to cut a very long and decidedly predictable story short: Archie, blind to Helena's true
character, falls deeper in love with her and is just about to propose when she goes and marries someone richer. (Obviously she doesn't love him either.) He's devastated and turns once more to the shade of Martin for solace. Unfortunately it soon becomes clear ~ to the reader, and to Jessie, but obviously not to Archie, totally devoid as he is of the gift of insight ~ that the shade he's communing with regularly isn't Martin at all, but some 'evil spirit' who promptly ~ very promptly ~ sends him to the bad: he becomes addicted to absinth (yes, you read that right) and resolves to have an affair with Helena behind her husband's back.
Just then some war or other starts in Europe (details are vague), the husband is conveniently killed in action, and Archie is 'rescued' by Jessie > The End. Yes, it really is like that: after maundering on for 300 pages or so, EFB suddenly realizes he's getting near his permitted word-count and wraps the whole thing up in about 20 pages with thoroughly unseemly haste.
VERDICT: 'uneven' doesn't come anywhere near covering Across the Stream: the first part is very good, uncharacteristically good; the remainder suffers from EFB's sadly all-too-typical ropey plotting and bletheriness; the ending feels more like afterthought than logical and consequential conclusion.
THE CRITICS
~The Daily Mail [Hull, UK], 12/06/1919It is quite undeniable that within the last few years there has been an immense increase in the number of those who take an interest in matters relating to fortune-telling, telepathy, thought reading, and things broadly classed as spiritual. To some individual temperaments the occult has a great lure. It would not be true to say that these persons are all neurotic, or victims of a disordered imagination. Many of them, like Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sir Oliver Lodge, Mrs Ella Wheeler Wilcox, Mr E. F. Benson, and many others are men and women whose honesty of purpose no one doubts. […] Young people should be warned against the folly of attempted intercourse with the powers of the unseen universe. Mr E. F. Benson's latest novel, Across the Stream, shows the perilous possibilities of haphazard traffic with spirits which may be bad as well as good […]
Mr. Benson has never written with greater charm than in his picture of the child life of Archie in this story. There is a psychic element, delicately treated in its inception but as it grows to be the real theme less interesting to the imaginative appreciation of those who are not believers in psychic phenomena.
~The Outlook
(US), 25/06/1919
[...] Across the Stream possess[es] [...] the merit of fine workmanship. […] Mr. Benson has his inevitable touch of the garish and the excessive. But the art [...] is ripe and flexible. […] the fine Italian landscapes of Mr. Benson, are admirably rendered; [the] characters live with a strong if not very lasting life. [...] Mr. Benson uses all his dash and color to make the figure of Archie both brilliant and exquisite. And yet [the book is], in any deep and serious sense, unimportant. It is not because [Mr. Benson has] chosen these people and not others. It is because in drawing [his] characters and telling [his story he has] been too little concerned with memory, which is the mother of the creative imagination, and too much concerned with a fancy that grows out of emotional impulses and builds a vain and fleeting shadow world above that reality from which arises all our suffering but likewise all that we know of beauty. [Across the Stream deals] with the supposed communication between the living and the dead. Facts of the utmost questionableness and theories of the most baseless improbability are treated as established in the practice and experience of life. [...] Mr. Benson [has never] faced the real nature of the problem or the limitations of average minds, or [...] reflected on the insurmountable difficulties of the question of human evidence. [He has] deliberately built [his novel] upon a foundation more insecure than the shifting sand. And no amount of talent or skill in the details of execution can save [it] from the result. "Thought," wrote RĂ©my de Gourmont, "is the man himself. And style and thought are one."
~The Nation,
02/08/1919 [wow, what a
stupid
review!]
Mr E F Benson's literary talent is as remarkable as ever, for his latest book ~ Across the Stream […] ~ is distinguished by the charm of its phrasing, its balance of light and shade, its technique, and that quality, elusive as light, which is usually known as 'style'. The book is divided into three parts, of which the first is the most remarkable as a study of the psychology of a child, and of scenes and pictures of his earliest days of childhood from the time when his powers of memory were only just beginning to germinate; and the horizon of his outlook on life was ~ only very gradually ~ widening through scenes and situations in which he was “still a detached observer, looking at them as through a telescope.” Mr Benson has either a marvellous memory of his own childhood, or has made a vital study of the floating impressions and untranslatable instincts of other children he may have known. In any case, we follow the pilgrimage of the hero of his book from childhood to manhood with unabated interest to the end. It is an admirable and convincing piece of literary craftsmanship.
~The Yorkshire Post, 30/07/1919
Saturday, 18 May 2013
The Dance on the Beefsteak
Fiction ~ short story
First published 01/07/1902; collected in The Countess of Lowndes Square and Other Stories 1920
Approx. 3,200 words
(First read 18/05/2013)
First published 01/07/1902; collected in The Countess of Lowndes Square and Other Stories 1920
Approx. 3,200 words
(First read 18/05/2013)
Friday, 17 May 2013
Friday, 29 March 2013
The Image in the Sand
Fiction ~ novel
Published 1905
Approx. 147,000 words
(First read 29/03/2013)
I have to admit
this was pretty poor: a preposterous plot full of dodgy hokery-pokery
(or hokum-pokum, if you prefer), unbelievably long-winded (the whole
thing could've fitted into a short story), and really amazingly dull,
with a whole tanker-load of cardboard cutout characters, implausible
plot 'twists', boring Ancient Egyptian mumbo-jumbo, boring Modern
English spiritualist tripe ... you name it. Avoid.
Published 1905
Approx. 147,000 words
(First read 29/03/2013)
![]() |
| US Edition |
Sunday, 27 January 2013
The Luck of the Vails
Fiction ~ novel
Published 1901
Approx. 117,000 words
(First read 27/01/2013)
In his family memoir Mother (1925) Benson has this to say on the composition of The Luck of the Vails:
THE CRITICS
Published 1901
Approx. 117,000 words
(First read 27/01/2013)
In his family memoir Mother (1925) Benson has this to say on the composition of The Luck of the Vails:
[...] I was deeply immersed in a sensational tale called The Luck of the Vails. The germ of it was a story that [my brother] Arthur had told his boys at Eton: this he presented to me with the rhyming legend which ran round the rim of the jewelled cup which was the "Luck" and the clue of the tale:
"When the Luck of the Vails is lost, / Fear not rain nor fire nor frost; / When the Luck is found again, / Fear both fire and frost and rain."
That uncanny and suggestive rhyme fermented in my brain with yeasty bubblings, and I enjoyed for months the heavenly illusion which sometimes comes to scribblers that their puppets and the adventures of them have an existence more real than that of the folk among whom they live. The great yew hedge in my tale became the real yew hedge, and the hedge at [my mother's house] Tremans from which I took it was but shadowy in comparison ...
THE CRITICS
One might begin to read The Luck of the Vails lying back in a comfortable chair, and chuckling over the natural talk of Mr. Benson's pleasant people. But after an hour or so, assuming that it is a hot day, and that you turn the leaves without great energy, you find yourself sitting up and gripping the arms of the chair, and glancing uneasily over your shoulder at the sound of a step upon the gravel. For this is a really thrilling and exciting tale of crime and mystery that Mr. Benson has written. It is readable all through and full of entertainment.
~The Times,
quoted in the endpapers of The Book of Months and Juggernaut
The book is very ingeniously constructed, and delightful reading, while the machinations of the septuagenarian villain, with his cheerful flute, his rosy cheeks, and his brisk enjoyment of life, are calculated to give a proper Christmas thrill on the hottest midsummer afternoon.
~The Spectator,
quoted in endpapers to An Act in a Backwater and Sheaves
In his stories of English life Mr. Benson usually trusts more to manner than to plot for the amusement of his readers; but here he has got hold of a very pretty sensation, and treated it most effectively. It is something of a triumph to throw us off the scent so completely as he does with regard to Francis's character, which is treated throughout with a subtlety that is generally wanting in melodrama. For the most interesting portion of the book is melodrama. There is an ordinary pleasant love story, and there is some light, bantering dialogue, enough to give it the flavour of a society novel. But we pay little heed to these. The setting might just as well have been mediaeval, for it is the jewelled Luck, and the perils by fire and rain and frost of the young hero, and the creeping wiles of the crafty villain, and his dark exits and entrances by secret staircases, that hold us fast. But no doubt it gives a piquancy to hear the most up-to-date speech in the neighbourhood of jewelled Lucks and swinging panels and dogging murderers.
~The Bookman
(US), 09/1901
Mr. Benson has given us an extremely interesting study of a criminal temperament, and has so arranged matters psychological as to prohibit us from fault-finding. The Luck of the Vails is melodrama on the higher plane, and we cordially congratulate Mr. Benson on having found and invented yet another genre for the exercise of his literary talent.
~The Daily
Chronicle, quoted in endpapers to An Act in a Backwater
Mr. E. F. Benson has a nice sense of humour. The dialogue is all through witty. The story holds us from the rising of the curtain to the going down of the same.
~Vanity Fair,
quoted in endpapers to An Act in a Backwater
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





